Strength in the field

field_strength_0

Field_strength

These restroom signs I spotted in rural Chongqing municipality made me pause. Reflect for a moment upon what it takes to be a man or a woman in your context, and how that varies between other contexts.

On the man: Why the shades? Why the frown? Why the absurdly thick neck? Are these standards locally-grown, or imported? Finally, why could this not be a woman? Is he meant to be foreign?

On the woman: Why the light-colored hair (is she meant to be foreign)? Why could this not be a man?

For both: Could these signs be redrawn to base gender solely on neck size? How would this type of sign look in your context?

Finaly, consider the Chinese character for man: the ideograph for “field” (as in, a field of rice) above the one for “strength”. Would those standards still apply today in your context for a man’s defining gender characteristics? While they might still apply in some parts of China for some demographics, looking around and talking with people makes me think that cultural standards for manliness have undergone a sea change in the People’s Republic in the past few decades.

Keeping such change in mind, what would a re-drawn character for “man” look like? What two (or three, or four) ideographs would constitute the “new man”? Would “strength” stay in?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s