Contingent functionality

contingent_funcitonality_shoes

When one flip-flop (thong) breaks, the other is abandoned simultaneously (perhaps at the very spot where it broke). Compare this to these shoes – which brings greater status penalization? Wearing a different type of flip-flop on each foot (implying the matching flip-flop broke, though I’ve never seen this and wouldn’t imagine much point to it), wearing “short-tailed shoes”, or going barefoot? What does your cultural context decree, and where does the “frayed” or “worn” look go from low-status to vogue? Captured at downtown’s Bogyoke Market on a quiet morning, how long do you think these would last here before they are picked up and whisked back into Yangon’s recycling/repurposing system? How long would they last on the street where you are? Would they be reclaimed for repurposing’s sake (their intrinsic value) or because of their status as an “eyesore” or “rubbish”?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s